This should be a wake-up call for authorities all over the world, to ensure the safety of our judges as well as all the other civil servants. Unlimited freedom for criticism, debates and even protests against civil servants is not only unavoidable but desirable: it's the main differentiator between dictatorships and democratic societies. However, the public must be constantly educated that the personal safety (not necessarily the comfort, but the absolute safety) of any civil servant should never be put at risk by any action, even in the name of freedom, that is in protest against the opinion, position or role of that civil servant. Authorities must make sure - without crossing the prohibited line of the public's freedom to protest and to criticize - that such a tragedy will never happen again. Anger and frustration against a judge's decision may, in some extreme cases, push people into extreme depression, and that may result in desperate actions. The society do not protect the judges from this common situation and this should be addressed in a way that the furstated people will have another way to relax and not by hearting anybody else. By nature, plenty of judges' decisions can be absolutely wrong - just as with any other human being - but the way to deal with them should never be by acts of violence. In fact, the majority of judges' decisions are probably right, but may genuinely considered to be wrong in the eyes of those who lost the case. But violence as a response should never be an option in a free and developed society that already has effective ways of dealing with judicial mistakes. And of course violence should never be an option when judges make the right decisions which push people into a situation where they feel they have nothing left to lose. A healthy society must be united in protecting its civil servants' and guaranteeing their safety, just as much - not any more and not any less- as for any other citizen. Everybody's lives matter.