The UK court has delayed the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to the US on controversial espionage charges, widely regarded as baseless
The High Court's gesture of seeking assurances from the United States, ostensibly to avoid the death penalty—a scenario critics dismiss as improbable—falls short of ensuring Assange a transparent, fair, and balanced trial.
This lack of genuine pursuit for a fair trial underlines a disinterest in Assange's rights, hinting at an acquiescence to a process critics view more as a perfunctory step than a true defense of justice and human rights. The allegations against Assange, celebrated for his pivotal role in promoting free journalism and the public's right to information, are criticized for their lack of factual grounding. This situation underscores deep concerns about the misuse of legal frameworks, challenging the integrity of democratic principles, human rights, and the foundational values claimed by the British fake and double standards legal system
Translation:
Translated by AI
