British Virgin Islands

Sunday, Aug 01, 2021

Immigration did not instruct mother to leave child behind @ airport- Hon Wheatley

Immigration did not instruct mother to leave child behind @ airport- Hon Wheatley

The expatriate woman who recently exited the Virgin Islands, leaving her infant child behind- allegedly at the airport-did so as a matter of choice and was not forced to do so by the Department of Immigration.

This is according to Minister for Natural Resources, Labour and Immigration Hon Vincent O. Wheatley (R9) in a statement on the issue today, June 18, 2021.

Further, Hon Wheatley commended Chief Immigration Officer Mr Ian B. Penn for going above and beyond to assist the woman, including to ensure that her time out of the territory was short.

Mother has reunited with child


The Minister also noted that the woman has since returned to the territory and reunited with her child.

The issue was first raised by host of the Honestly Speaking Radio Programme, Mr Claude O. Skelton Cline.

“Just about a week and a half ago, I was called to lend some assistance, a lady who was told that she had to leave the country to come back in to get her permit transferred. Here’s this woman she is leaving the country, she has a six-month-old baby, gets to the airport and then they tell her the baby can’t leave, but she has to go. I mean, can you imagine that? A six-month-old baby!” he said during his show on Thursday, June 10, 2021, on 780 ZBVI Radio.

According to the commentator, the woman had to call her intended employer to collect the baby at the airport.

Immigration Department was wrongfully blamed


With lots of information missing, there was much uproar and speculation on social media. Many assumed that the woman was forced by immigration authorities to leave the child behind.

Hon Wheatley made it abundantly clear; however, that at no time did the Immigration Department give any instructions or demands that would have resulted in the separation of this individual from their infant child as has been widely broadcasted.

He explained that in July 2020, the individual approached the Immigration Department after resigning from her employment due to the effects of the ongoing pandemic and sought to apply for a Conditional Permit, at which time a preliminary assessment of the individual took place.

Woman was given Conditional Permit @ discretion of CIO


Conditional Permits are utilised by individuals who are seeking to remain within the Territory while they seek to change employer, or change from a status of residing without the ability to work, to being able to take up gainful employment. The Act stipulates that an individual attempting to change employer should have held valid permits to engage in gainful occupation, for at least five years, preceding the date of the application. The Act also allows for a person seeking to change from residing without employment should have held a valid permit to reside in the Territory other than for the purpose of engaging in any gainful occupation, for at least three years, preceding the date of the application.

The Minister noted; however, that the individual did not meet the requirements required to obtain a Conditional Permit as stipulated by Section 31(1A) of the Immigration & Passport (Amendment) Act (the Act).

He explained that the individual in question did not meet the five-year requirement for persons who are seeking to change employer.

“However, after further assessment by the department of the individual’s case and the ongoing pandemic, the Chief Immigration Officer utilised his discretion as per Section 31 (2A) of the Act and approved the issuance of a Conditional Permit to the individual on 11th August, 2020 for a period of three months, as is the customary issue time.”

Work permit was denied


Hon Wheatley said that during the three (3) month period, it is expected that an individual would undergo the change of employer work permit processing with the Department of Labour and Workforce Development and subsequently return to the Immigration Department to complete the work permit process.

“However, the individual and the prospective employer were unable to meet a number of very important requirements of the Labour Code 2010 as stipulated by the Department of Labour and Workforce Development. This resulted in the denial of the work permit in late November of 2020, by which time, the issued Conditional Permit had lapsed.”

Individual overstayed in territory for 3 months


Hon Wheatley continued that the individual, after receiving information on the denial of the work permit, had not presented herself to the Immigration Department until February 23, 2021, three months after the issued Conditional Permit had lapsed.

“During an interview held on that date, the individual was informed that they had been overstaying in the Territory and the full ramifications for such an offence were shared. Subsequently, the individual was asked to surrender her travel documents, to which she complied. The individual was then asked to acquire a ticket to depart the Territory as she had surpassed the usually allotted time for any reasonable extensions to the Conditional Permit to be issued.”

Immigration Dept was very flexible


Noting that the department continues to assess matters and seek to identify ways in which members of the public could be assisted during this time of hardship, Hon Wheatley said the Chief Immigration Officer instructed that a further assessment be carried out and this resulted in a further interview with the individual and prospective employer to again assist with the matter.

This interview, he said, then highlighted the continued non-compliance with the Department of Labour and Workforce Developments requirements, which ultimately resulted in the decision to deny the work permit to remain.

“Therefore, it was agreed that the matter was beyond repair and the individual was informed that they would have to depart the Territory, as it was clear that no further effort was made by the employer to rectify the matter.

Guidance was given by Immigration Dept


“Consequently, the individual received assistance with the necessary guidance to regularise the infant child with the other parent as they were residing on a valid work permit. Assistance was also given to assist the individual in acquiring an emergency travel document for the infant child so that they may travel without issue.”

Hon Wheatley noted; however, that one month later, in March 2021, the individual returned to the department indicating that their homeland had issued a temporary travel ban.

“As all involved awaited the lifting of the ban, the individual received assistance from the Immigration Department and the Civil Registry and Passport Office in acquiring the necessary documents for the infant, as well as information on additional requirements for connecting destinations during their travels.”

He said on May 28, 2021, the individual presented an itinerary for departure and return to the VI, at which time the passport was prepared and transferred to the Immigration Departments Terrance B. Lettsome International Airport offices to await departure.

The individual then departed the VI on May 30, 2021, without the infant and returned on June 9, 2021, with a new clearance for employment with the previously proposed employer.

Individual had received ‘exception consideration- Hon Wheatley


“I would like to again highlight the fact that the individual received exceptional consideration and approval by the Chief Immigration Officer for a conditional permit, when they had not qualified, which eventually lapsed due to issues with the employer’s inability to meet the Department of Labour and Workforce Developments requirements.

“I would further like to applaud the Chief Immigration Officer and his team for assisting extensively with this particular case, especially with the regularising of the infant child’s status so that seamless travel of the family could take place.”

Hon Wheatley said it would be remiss of her to not mention again that the separation of the infant from its parent was not the fault nor a directive of the Immigration Department, but rather a decision made by the parent when confronted with a choice related to their travel capabilities. The extraordinary assistance given in this particular case further highlights my ministry and the Immigration Department’s commitment to providing exceptional service while we continue to uphold the laws of these Virgin Islands as it relates to migration and border security.

: Hon Vincent O. Wheatley (R9) said the extraordinary assistance given in this particular case further highlights his ministry and the Immigration Department’s commitment to providing exceptional service while continuing to uphold the laws of the Virgin Islands as it relates to migration and border security.

Chief Immigration Officer Mr Ian B. Penn has been commended for going above and beyond to assist the expatriate woman who had to leave the territory while changing jobs.

Newsletter

Related Articles

British Virgin Islands
×