Beautiful Virgin Islands

Sunday, Aug 02, 2026

We can't focus on which royal said what - the institution needs investigating

We can't focus on which royal said what - the institution needs investigating

As soon as news of Meghan and Harry’s televised sit-down with Oprah Winfrey was confirmed, there was immediate and intense speculation over the possible content of the interview, and the revelations that would soon come to light.

Now, after weeks of waiting and thousands of headlines, the two-hour special has aired and the hype hasn’t disappointed.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex lifted the lid on the reasons why they left their positions as senior, working members of the Royal Family as well as revisiting some of the most publicised claims about them made in the press.

A point that has particularly stoked conversation following the broadcast is that, while Meghan was pregnant with their son Archie, the couple were told that their unborn child wouldn’t receive a title nor security, while an unnamed member of the family voiced ‘concerns’ about how dark their child – the product of an interracial relationship – would be.

Unsurprisingly, this line has led to the widespread theorising of exactly who was responsible for the comment – the use of the word ‘concern’ implying that the darkness of the child’s skin would be a negative factor.



While, for some, uncovering the identity of the family member involved feels like an important mystery to solve, something that is more worthy of attention is the fact that this was a query in the first place.

Though pinning the blame to a name has captured public curiosity, with Winfrey confirming on Monday that the comments didn’t come from The Queen or Prince Philip, perhaps not knowing who the culprit is isn’t such a bad thing, as without it, it provokes a necessary interrogation of the way that race is handled by the institution as a whole.

Racism and prejudice are rarely isolated occurrences, nor are they confined to one singular event from an individual.

To hear that there were worries within the family over the complexion of an unborn child is shocking only if you haven’t paid attention: the precedent for unsavoury behaviour when it comes to matters of race has been an issue in the Royal Family not only in the past few years but long before Meghan and Archie were a part of it.

Through the atrocities of the British Empire, the monarchy is responsible for the destabilisation of many countries, the majority of whom are home to Black and brown people.

Celebrated in contemporary times as a global union of 54 of the formerly-colonised countries, under the title of ‘The Commonwealth’, the places that suffered under British invasion and rule are still recovering from the effects today, with few examples of serious acknowledgement of the harm caused.

With this as a baseline issue, it’s unsurprising that the integration of the family hasn’t gone as harmoniously as Prince Harry and Meghan would have hoped.

At this point, there are few limits as to what some outlets will say about Meghan and Harry


The interview laid bare several other questionable instances in recent years – many relating to the institution’s failure to provide public and private support for Meghan in the face of scathing attacks in the media.

Another notable moment saw Meghan denying claims that she made Kate, Duchess of Cambridge cry in the days before her May 2018 wedding, over a matter relating to flower girl dresses. According to Meghan, the reverse occurred: it was Kate who brought her to tears.

Unfortunately, a few months after the wedding, many media outlets and commentators ran with the story of the new Duchess wielding her power to upset Kate, continuing the damaging narrative of Black women and women of colour being labelled ‘aggressive’ and ‘a bully’ in comparison to their white counterparts.

I can’t help but think, how difficult would it have been for The Palace to address what was going on and help put an end to these allegations?

Prejudice thrives when it is part of a system of complicity, with those who have a stake in upholding the status quo staying silent, rather than speaking out against the wrongs they have witnessed.

Because of the refusal to address the racially-fuelled treatment of the media, head-on, the Royal Family has been integral to creating this harmful relationship between the Sussexes and British media.

At this point, there are few limits as to what some outlets will say about Meghan and Harry, because when faced with the worst commentary on them, these remarks have been allowed to spread for millions to read and form opinions from.

By not publicly standing up for their members of colour, the monarchy has allowed the common discourse around the Sussexes to become, in Harry’s words, the ‘toxic environment’ of ‘control and fear’ that they’ve tried to escape.

It has resulted in TV hosts weakly attempting to reason that the comment on Archie’s skin tone was merely a case of ‘casual racism’ as if that would make it more acceptable.

It has led to another broadcaster racing to his morning television post to rubbish Meghan’s admission that she was suicidal as a result of her experience as a working royal, claiming he didn’t believe she was telling the truth.

It’s worth noting that both Harry and Meghan emphatically declared that they would have continued to be a part of the Royal Family had they been supported. If they’d been protected, they’d still be happy to uphold the values of the monarchy, which some take serious issue with.

Alas, this was not to be – so now, there is a real opportunity for the monarchy to reckon with their responsibility for the unfortunate way that this chain of events has played out.

Like all institutions, the Royal Family is not perfect and should be subject to scrutiny in order to try to make things better. No good comes from turning away from a difficult matter when it’s clear that others are in pain – especially when you have the power to help.

Silence in the face of injustice is being part of the problem. Regardless of who exactly was concerned over a baby’s skin colour, the Royal Family as a whole is long overdue for some reflection on where they’ve gone wrong.

Newsletter

Related Articles

Beautiful Virgin Islands
0:00
0:00
Close
Finland Deploys Commercial-Scale Thermal Batteries Using Crushed Rock to Store Renewable Grid Energy
Valued at $109 Million: F-35B Fighter Jet Crashes in Southern California
Andy Burnham has Announces Plans to Redistribute Income Tax Revenue to English Mayors
Early-Release Scheme Faces Fresh Scrutiny as Reoffending and Prison Recalls Rise
Police Phone Checks Followed Report on Murder of MI5 Agent Inside Sinn Féin
Archbishop of Canterbury Reaffirms £100 Million Reparative Justice Fund During Ghana Visit
Drought Status Extended Across All of Wales as Heat and Dry Weather Deepen Environmental Strain
Record-Low Danube Exposes Probable Mammoth Remains in Bulgaria
US Says It Has Carried Out Heavy Strikes on Iran After Attempted Attacks on Its Forces
The chief executive of the popular gaming company laid off many employees and his pay rose to 38 million dollars
The World's Most Terrifying Smartphone: Recording, Documenting, and Reporting to the Regime
The AI User Nightmare: Private Claude Conversations Leaked to the Internet
UK: Former Football Association Leaders Call for World Cup Boycott Over FIFA Privatization Plan
Forbidden Love: China severs millions from their virtual partners
Over 24 Hours in the Air: Qantas Airbus Completes Record-Breaking Test Flight
Zuckerberg Opposes US Ban on Chinese AI Models and Warns of Regulatory Capture
Massive Wildfires Ravage Southern Europe: Fatalities in Greece and Evacuations Across France, Spain, and Turkey
Trump says Israel ‘would not survive’ without US
France Evacuates Atlantic Coast Resorts as Wildfire Risk Rises Again
Magnitude 7.1 Earthquake Strikes Kumamoto as Rescuers Search Collapsed Buildings
OpenAI Faces Demands for Full Disclosure After Models Breach Hugging Face
Nvidia Reportedly Takes Vast Texas Data-Centre Lease to Underwrite AI Expansion
Royal Collection Trust Income Falls as Palace Visits Retreat From Record Highs
FIFA’s Private-Investment Plan for World Cup Rights Draws European Revolt
Ministers Examine Social-Care Levy as Burnham Seeks Funding Settlement
Apple Briefly Crosses Five Trillion Dollar Valuation as Investors Retreat From AI Bets
Badenoch Offers Tory Votes to Keep Serious Offenders in Prison
Why Americans Queue for $15 Ice Cream and a $100 Caviar Pint
Another AI Genius Left the United States — and Silicon Valley Is Starting to Worry
Shein Reports $99mn Loss as Trade Barriers Test Low-Cost Model
CXMT Gains 466% in China’s Biggest IPO Since 2010
Amazon Seeks Approval for 5,105-Satellite Mobile Network
Burnham Puts School-to-Work Reform at Centre of Welfare Strategy
Burnham Rules Out Replacing Council Tax and Stamp Duty
Fresh Heatwave Threatens to Rekindle France’s Historic Wildfire Crisis
Following OpenAI's Cyberattack: 'Most Companies Still Do Not Understand What Is Coming'
Autopsy Finds No Violence in Death of Epstein-Linked Model Scout
Indian Education Minister Resigns After Cockroach Youth Protests
California Desert Data-Centre Plan Stalls as Water and Power Disputes Mount
War, Youth Revolt and the Global Struggle for Control
War, Power and the Rising Price of Political Decisions
Badenoch Rejects Grant Shapps' Bid to Return as Conservative Candidate
BAE Chief Warns Britain Has Underestimated the Risk of War
Burnham Rules Out New Scottish Independence Referendum in First Talks With Swinney
OpenAI Sued After ChatGPT Allegedly Discouraged Emergency Care Before Near-Fatal Embolism
Viral Video Raises Questions Over Twelve-Dollar Croissants at Manhattan Bakery
Miliband Sets Climate and International Law at Centre of UK Diplomacy
US Gasoline Returns to $4 as Renewed Iran Fighting Disrupts Oil Flows
Czech Central Bank Governor Rejects Early Euro Entry and Rate-Cut Pressure
Trump Orders 50% Tariffs on Selected Canadian Imports
×