Beautiful Virgin Islands

Saturday, Apr 26, 2025

Meta's rules for checking VIP posts have caused 'real harm' and need 'overhaul', review says

Meta's rules for checking VIP posts have caused 'real harm' and need 'overhaul', review says

Posts from politicians, celebrities or business partners of Facebook and Instagram's parent company Meta are passed through a special VIP channel known as cross-check, which gives them extra leeway to break the company's rules. 

On Facebook and Instagram there are rules about what can and can't be posted.

They can change from time to time, as can the way they are enforced by human and robot moderators. But in theory the rules are the same for every one of the sites' nearly five billion users.

Unless, that is, you happen to be a politician, celebrity or a business partner of Facebook and Instagram's parent company Meta.

Their posts, and those of around 5.8 million other influential users, are passed through a special VIP channel known as cross-check, which gives them extra leeway to break Meta's rules.

The exemptions can be significant. If a normal user's post is flagged by the automated moderation system, it will be taken down immediately.

If a VIP's post is flagged, it will stay up while human moderators take a second (or even a third, fourth or fifth) look at it.

In September 2011, for instance, the Brazilian footballer Neymar posted intimate imagery of someone else on his Facebook and Instagram accounts, without, it was reported, the permission of the person involved.

The video was a clear breach of Meta's content policies, which forbid many relatively mild forms of nudity. Yet, according to The Guardian, it was left online for over a day and received 56 million views before it was taken down.


Neymar was on Meta's list for cross-check

The reason for the delay? Neymar, who later announced a business deal with Meta to promote Facebook Gaming, was on the list for cross-check, which was struggling to deal with a backlog at the time.

This kind of delay, which on average lasts five days, rising to 12 in the United States and 17 in Syria, is one of several aspects of cross-check sharply criticised by Meta's Oversight Board, the semi-independent internal "court" set up by Mark Zuckerberg to advise on difficult issues around moderation.

The board has been reviewing the programme since last year, when whistleblower Frances Haugen revealed the scale of the system by leaking internal company documents to the Wall Street Journal.

In a report published on Tuesday, the board calls on Meta to overhaul the programme, arguing that it "prioritises users of commercial value" over its "human rights responsibilities and company values".

The system has caused "real harm", Oversight Board director Thomas Hughes told Sky News. Yet he fell short of calling for the system to be disbanded, saying "you do need to have some kind of secondary review process".

The board called on Meta to overhaul cross-check by making the process quicker and more transparent and by refocusing it on human rights related issues, such as accidental removal of journalistic material.

It says Meta should set out clear criteria for involvement in cross-check and publicly mark accounts which are included in the system, particularly state actors or business partners. At present, even those people who are subject to cross-check don't know they are listed.

The report says that Meta prefers under-enforcing its rules, to avoid creating a "perception of censorship" or stirring up "public controversy" for commercial partners, especially ones who can create trouble for senior Meta executives.

However, in order to avoid damaging delays in moderation, the board suggests that content flagged as "high severity" on first review should be taken down while it is reassessed.

Meta does not have to follow the board's suggestions and has declined to do so on several notable occasions, although Mr Hughes said the company tended to implement most recommendations. In this case, there are 32.

"They won't implement them all, but given the implementation rate to date, I think they will implement the majority," said Mr Hughes. "The board thinks these recommendations are achievable."

Yet despite calling for Meta to "radically increase transparency around cross-check", the board struggled to generate full transparency itself, and many crucial details are missing from its report.

The board did not find out who exactly is on the cross-check list, despite "repeatedly asking". It was not able to confirm the exact number of people on the list, nor obtain detailed examples of posts that had been cross-checked.

"This limited disclosure impairs the board's ability to carry out its mandated oversight responsibilities," the board complained in its report.

The board previously said that Meta had "not been fully forthcoming" about cross-check, failing to mention the programme in relation to President Trump, and then saying it was small when in fact it involved millions of users.

Yet although whistleblower Ms Haugen accused Meta of "repeatedly lying" about the scheme, Mr Hughes disagreed, saying he believed the information the board had been given was "accurate" and "fulsome", and that the board had "flexed its muscles" to investigate the programme.

Critics argued that Meta's underlying problems were too big for the Oversight Board to fix, because implementing their most substantial suggestions would require the company to employ tens of thousands more human moderators, especially in countries outside the US and Canada.

The board found that these two countries account for 42% of cross-checked content despite only having 9% of monthly active users.

"The Haugen documents show a picture of systemic inequality in which the US, for all its moderation problems, gets the lion's share of the moderation resource and nearly everywhere else gets basically nothing," says Cori Crider, director of Foxglove, which is suing Meta on behalf of former Facebook content moderator Daniel Motaung.

"Until that imbalance is redressed, I can't see how the Oversight Board's opinions make much difference."
Newsletter

Related Articles

Beautiful Virgin Islands
0:00
0:00
Close
Trump administration moves to BAN essentially ALL artificial food dyes in the USA food supply at RFK Jr.'s direction
Woman slaps man at sports game and gets herself and husband beat up
Pope Francis: head of the Catholic church who pushed for social and economic justice
China do not pay these tariffs - you pay it. This is new 145% tax you pay to the US government.
Nightlife in the streets of Manchester
In God We Profit
Cultural Battles in the Vatican: The Candidates in the Battle for the Holy See and Pope Francis's Testament
Global Leaders Pay Tribute to Pope Francis Following His Death
Wild Chimpanzees Observed Bonding Over Alcoholic Fruit
US Federal Reserve Chair Issues Warning on Tariff Impact
UK Prison Officers Demand Electric Stun Guns Amid Safety Concerns
China, China, China!
Australian National Charged as Mercenary for Fighting in Ukraine
Israel Considers Limited Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Facilities Amid Diplomatic Efforts
Prince Andrew Joins Royal Family Attends Easter Sunday Service at Windsor Castle
Saudi Arabia Offers Max Verstappen Unprecedented Deal to Join Aston Martin
Global Pistachio Shortage Amid Rising Demand for 'Dubai Chocolate'
Trump is assembling a coalition of Western leaders aligned with the MAGA vision, strengthening a unified front for global change
IMF Predicts No Global Recession Amid Trade Tensions
Here’s a police officer with a brilliant gift for swift education
"Some complain that we put thousands in prison. In reality, we set millions free."
This is Vienna, Austria in 2025.
Boeing Jet Returns to US from China Amid Tariff War
Canadian Federal Election: Candidates' Positions on US-Canada Relations and Donald Trump
Resentencing Hearing for Menendez Brothers Who Killed Their Parents Delayed Amid Legal Disputes
Australian Woman Gives Birth To Stranger's Baby In IVF Mix-up
US Sets Deadline for Russia-Ukraine Peace Deal Brokerage
Italy Introduces 'Sex Rooms' in Prisons for Inmates
California Launches Legal Challenge Against Trump Administration's Tariffs
"Groundless": China Dismisses Zelensky's Claims It's Supplying Arms To Russia
UK Psytrance Festival Cancelled Amid Local Protests Over Noise Concerns
French Far-Right Writer Renaud Camus Denied Entry to UK
UK Police Force Updates Search Policy for Trans Individuals in Custody
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Meets with Donald Trump to Discuss EU-US Trade Tensions
Canada's Federal Party Leaders Engage in Final Debate Ahead of General Election
Ukraine and US Sign Outline of Minerals Deal
Fast Food Chain Refuses to Apologize for Online Comment About Katy Perry's Space Voyage
New York Attorney General Letitia James Faces Criminal Referral for Alleged Mortgage Fraud
Mark Cuban admits support for Trump executive order: ‘Gotta be honest’
US Senator Meets with Deported Immigrant in El Salvador Amid Custody Dispute
U.S. State Department Raises El Salvador’s Safety Ranking, Making It Safer Than France and Other European Nations
UK Government Assumes Control of British Steel's Scunthorpe Plant Amid Shutdown Threat
UK MP Wera Hobhouse Denied Entry to Hong Kong During Family Visit
Bangladesh Issues Arrest Warrant for UK MP Tulip Siddiq
China Urges United States to Cancel Tariffs Amid Escalating Trade Tensions
The Empire’s USD Pyramid Scheme Is Working Brilliantly—So Why ‘Fix’ It?
China Raises Tariffs on U.S. Goods to 125% Amid Escalating Trade Dispute
Elon Musk Reports $150 Billion in Projected Government Savings Amid Fraud Investigations
U.S. and Panama Finalize Defense Agreements Amid Canal Access and Chinese Influence Concerns
China Stands Firm Amidst Trade Disputes with the US: A Factual Analysis
×