Brazil, India and South Africa, which cumulatively represent more than 10% of global GDP (gross domestic product) and 20% of the world’s population, are expected to see GDP contractions of 7% on average in 2020.
Affluent G-20 countries have been able to implement strict lockdown measures and effective testing and tracing regimes, combined with higher levels of fiscal flexibility to support citizens as economies fell stagnant. The three countries were identified as being at higher risk of corruption and potential civil unrest than many of their G-20 counterparts.
Brazil, India and South Africa face the harshest road to recovery of all the G-20 (Group of 20) major economies, according to a new study.
The three nations have the second, third and fifth largest Covid-19 caseloads in the world respectively, but Verisk Maplecroft’s Recovery Capacity Index also identified underlying governance issues and weaker institutions as impediments to long-term emergence from the crisis.
The index measures more than a dozen factors which either underpin or undermine a recovery from a crisis. The Western European and East Asian G-20 nations, which suffered the worst initial hit from the pandemic now have the foundations in place to recover and scored on average 40% higher across the index than their emerging market counterparts.
Brazil, India and South Africa, which cumulatively represent more than 10% of global GDP (gross domestic product) and 20% of the world’s population, are projected to see their economies contract by an average of 7% in 2020, according to the IMF.
Institutional weaknesses, notably higher levels of corruption, were identified as the key factors separating poorer G-20 members from their more affluent counterparts.
“South Africa, India and Brazil each score as ‘high’ risk for corruption in our dataset, with Russia, Mexico and Indonesia falling into or near the ‘extreme’ risk category,” Verisk Maplecroft Principal Financial Sector Risk Analyst David Wille said in the report.
“Corrupt, ineffective and unstable governments will be limited in their ability to direct funding to where it is most needed, failing to revive the economy even after the immediate crisis is dealt with.”
Population sensitivity also reduces a country’s ability to handle shocks, and Brazil, India and South Africa were among the bottom performers, combining higher levels of poverty with lower “human capital.”
Connectivity was highlighted as an important pillar for recovery, with India scoring as “high” risk. The measure tracks physical distance between populations and the digital infrastructure which drives a resumption of commercial activity. South Africa, China, Mexico and Brazil all scored as “medium” risk on this criterion.
Other man-made or natural challenges faced by particular nations alongside the pandemic and economic considerations were also accounted for. In the case of Brazil, India and South Africa, Verisk analysts said disruption from civil unrest represents the largest compounding risk factor.
U.S. a ‘clear outlier’
In general, more affluent members of the G-20 bloc have been able to implement strict lockdown measures and effective testing and tracing regimes, combined with higher levels of fiscal flexibility to support citizens as economies fell stagnant.
“The clear outlier is the United States, which has had the least effective pandemic response of any developed market due to its inconsistent and politicized state-level reopening,” Wille said in the report.
“An elevated coronavirus
caseload will prolong the U.S. economic downturn, but its high fiscal firepower and underlying resilience will enable the economy to bounce back once outbreaks subside or a vaccine
becomes widely available.”
By contrast, both India and South Africa implemented strict lockdowns early, but lacked the fiscal and budgetary capacity to support their populations through prolonged periods of inactivity.
Brazil resisted enacting social-distancing measures while President Jair Bolsonaro dismissed the severity of the virus and promoted unfounded cures, only to end up contracting it himself as the country experienced the second-largest outbreak in the world, surpassing 3.4 million cases.
Unsuccessful state level lockdowns in Brazil and the ensuing backlash mean Verisk analysts expect governors to keep their economies open through the brunt of the crisis, exacerbating the human and economic tolls in the long run.
These factors also contribute to Brazil receiving the highest risk rating of the three countries for civil unrest over the next six months in Verisk’s datasets, combined with popular outrage over government corruption allegations. South Africa and India also score around the “extreme” risk rating for civil unrest potential.
“These compounding factors will exacerbate pre-existing socioeconomic issues, rising unemployment and unsatisfactory government responses to the pandemic,” said Wille.
“This creates higher levels of uncertainty for investors, and large-scale civil unrest has the potential to derail even the strongest of economic recoveries.”