Counter-Terrorism Review Criticized Following MP's Murder
Daughter of slain MP Sir David Amess and former colleagues express dissatisfaction with the counter-terrorism review related to his killer.
A review of the handling of Ali Harbi Ali, the man convicted of murdering MP Sir David Amess, has been deemed "clearly inadequate" by Amess' daughter, Katie Amess, and former Southend West MP Anna Firth.
They assert that the review, which examined Ali's involvement in the UK government's counter-terrorism initiatives, specifically the Prevent and Channel programs, fell short in addressing how he was radicalized prior to the attack.
The review, published on Wednesday, indicated that Ali had been radicalized online between 2014 and 2016, becoming an admirer of the Islamic State, yet characterized his risk as low by the time his case was closed in 2016. Documents referenced his wish to move to a Muslim country and his views on issues such as student loan interest and co-education, which he believed conflicted with his religious principles.
Despite these indicators, including his prior referral to the Prevent program by his school due to concerning behavioral changes, authorities involved reportedly did not fully recognize the signs of his radicalization or take significant preventive measures.
Notably, Ali purchased a large knife prior to his attack on Amess during a constituency surgery on October 15, 2021.
Katie Amess criticized the review for its lack of depth, stating, "It was literally going through paper trails and email logs.
It’s a paper exercise.
It doesn’t mean anything.
We need an inquiry.
We need answers.
We need accountability." Both she and Ms. Firth have been vocal about the need for a comprehensive public inquiry into the Prevent program's effectiveness in identifying and mitigating risks posed by individuals like Ali.
Security minister Dan Jarvis acknowledged the review identified several systemic failures within the Prevent program.
These included issues related to record-keeping and the assessment of Ali's vulnerabilities, which the reviewer suggested led to suboptimal handling of his case.
Jarvis mentioned that Ali was initially referred to Prevent amidst behavioral concerns in October 2014 and graduated to Channel in 2014, only to exit both programs by April 2016 when his risk was deemed low.
The review has prompted calls for additional scrutiny, as Sir David Amess's family believes that a public inquiry could unveil critical insights into radicalization trends and how counter-terrorism strategies are employed.
They also maintain that failures within the Prevent program could have broader implications for preventing future attacks.
The publication of the review follows the recent case involving killer Axel Rudakubana, which was also subjected to scrutiny under the Prevent framework.
Amid ongoing discussions about the integrity of the program, the Prime Minister has been urged to integrate findings regarding Amess's case into future inquiries.
Ali Harbi Ali was sentenced to a whole-life order in 2022 for his actions.
The government has since pledged to review protocols associated with the Prevent program, with several changes implemented since Ali's case was closed, aimed at enhancing its effectiveness.